#How to play hdr video media player clasic Pc
Yes, desktop mirroring a PC is another way of getting around the codec support issue. I'm not aware of it supporting any codec that isn't supported by a Roku player. The Amazon Fire Stick has the same video and audio codec support limitations that Roku has. It's lacking YouTube HDR, but that's about it. Yes, the Shield is the only player I've found that does almost everything. Am also using a $25 FIRESTICK to go another direction when ROKU fails to work to play video. Usually we have a coin flip chance it will work to play SUBTITLES on the roku.Īm using some MIRRORING from the laptop or from other devices to get around the limitation of ROKU. Emby and Plex both have apps for it, although I prefer using Kodi with my DLNA players can’t handle SUBTITLES correctly. The Nvidia Shield will play everything without transcoding (at least I haven't found anything), supports lossless audio, including Atmos/DTS:X, and will display any captions available. In fact, I'm using my DLNA PC for this post.īut for someone that has an extensive home media collection, especially if they have media with lossless audio, then a Roku isn't the best choice. You don't have to have a dedicated media computer to be the DLNA server. If you have other devices (smart TVs, Blu Ray Players, media players) that don't have apps for either, then a basic DLNA server might be preferable. If you only use Roku devices for playback, then something like Plex or Emby are excellent choices. Since most people already have a computer in their home that can run DLNA software, it's usually not too difficult to set up. Which is why I decided long ago to use a DLNA server. Yes, option one would require a lot of effort if you have many non-playable files. RMP works great under two scenarios: either your media all use Roku compatible codecs and containers, or you use a DLNA server that can transcode on the fly. The fact they support even some of the codecs is a nice plus, as when I first began using Roku players they didn't support DLNA at all. One way they keep the price down is by not paying licensing fees for codecs that only a handful of users might use. Roku is designed primarily as an inexpensive Internet streaming device. VLC is written in a programming language that differs significantly enough from what they use to make it not worth the effort.
![how to play hdr video media player clasic how to play hdr video media player clasic](https://assets.hongkiat.com/uploads/video-playback-smooth-video-project/media-player-classic.jpg)
VLC would have to build a version for Roku, which they have repeatedly stated they will not do.
![how to play hdr video media player clasic how to play hdr video media player clasic](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/_5VfqtpLnSw/maxresdefault.jpg)
I should be able to plug my HDD into the USB n just watch. Why doesn't Roku just add VLC media player or Classic MP? Streaming adds distortion for other devices and requires an entire secondary system. My other option is to re-encode everything to a **bleep** format after I just converted it to the best formats.
![how to play hdr video media player clasic how to play hdr video media player clasic](https://www.videohelp.com/softwareimages/media_player_classic_home_cinema_1134-2.jpg)
If you have to have an entirely separate system to broadcast your media files, then I may as well just have a computer and a regular TV.
#How to play hdr video media player clasic tv
Reading more comments, I see that a Roku smart TV is absolutely pointless.